A COMPARISON OF MANAGERIAL BEHAVIOR IN COOPERATIVES AND INVESTOR OWNED FIRMS SERVING FARMERS

Authors:
Perraut, Ellis Edward
Type: Thesis
Journal title: Graduate Research Master's Degree Plan B Papers
Year of publication: 1983
Source: AgEcon
Collected from: AGRIS
Subject:
cooperatives
Description:What difference does it make whether farmers are served by cooperatives or investor owned firms? Are these two forms of organizations really different? Cooperative ownership principles result in owners being more interdependent and interactive with managers of the work organization than do investor ownership principles. This difference results in a difference in manager roles and cooperative firm behavior unless the interdependence and interaction is offset by technological constraints, complexity, product diversity, and rate of change in the environment. Institutional Analysis and Organizational Behavior-Contingency Theory are used to link the influence of ownership principles and task environment to managerial role behavior.
 

Related Resources

New producer strategies: the emergence of patron-driven entrepreneurship

Provider: 
Subject: 
cooperatives
agribusiness and cooperatives

Farmers' Cooperatives in the EU: Policies, Strategies, and Organization

Provider: 
Subject: 
policies
agricultural policies
cooperatives
agribusiness and cooperatives

“Agric[Part I: New Development of Agricultural Cooperatives: Theory and Evidence]: Agricultural Cooperatives.

Provider: 
Subject: 
policies
agricultural policies
economics
agricultural economics
cooperatives
agribusiness and cooperatives

Incentives to Efficient Investment Decisions in Agricultural Cooperatives

Recent studies have questioned the competitiveness of agricultural cooperatives in an industrialized food system, based on empirical results and economic theory. New organizational institutions have been proposed to overcome the cooperative main weaknesses (the so called new generation cooperatives). In this paper, we provide a simple model based on a financial approach to address the issue of cooperative competitiveness and to assess the investment efficiency of both traditional and new generation cooperatives. The main conclusions of the analysis are: i) cooperatives (both traditional and new generation ones) may have incentive to adopt projects that do not maximize the Net Present Value of the firm ii) the institutions of new generation cooperatives are not sufficient to ensure net present value maximization, even though they address some of the main concerns of traditional cooperatives iii) traditional cooperatives may have a competitive advantage in businesses that require the aggregation of a large number of farmers.

Provider: 
Subject: 
cooperatives
agribusiness and cooperatives
Collected from: 

VEGMARC II: A COMPUTERIZED REORD KEEPING SYSTEM FOR VEGETABLE MARKETING COOPERATIVES

Provider: 
Subject: 
cooperatives
Collected from: 

The Horizon Problem Reconsidered

Provider: 
Subject: 
cooperatives
Collected from: 

AGRERI Library

New producer strategies: the emergence of patron-driven entrepreneurship

Provider: 
Subject: 
cooperatives
agribusiness and cooperatives

Farmers' Cooperatives in the EU: Policies, Strategies, and Organization

Provider: 
Subject: 
policies
agricultural policies
cooperatives
agribusiness and cooperatives

“Agric[Part I: New Development of Agricultural Cooperatives: Theory and Evidence]: Agricultural Cooperatives.

Provider: 
Subject: 
policies
agricultural policies
economics
agricultural economics
cooperatives
agribusiness and cooperatives

External Library

Incentives to Efficient Investment Decisions in Agricultural Cooperatives

Recent studies have questioned the competitiveness of agricultural cooperatives in an industrialized food system, based on empirical results and economic theory. New organizational institutions have been proposed to overcome the cooperative main weaknesses (the so called new generation cooperatives). In this paper, we provide a simple model based on a financial approach to address the issue of cooperative competitiveness and to assess the investment efficiency of both traditional and new generation cooperatives. The main conclusions of the analysis are: i) cooperatives (both traditional and new generation ones) may have incentive to adopt projects that do not maximize the Net Present Value of the firm ii) the institutions of new generation cooperatives are not sufficient to ensure net present value maximization, even though they address some of the main concerns of traditional cooperatives iii) traditional cooperatives may have a competitive advantage in businesses that require the aggregation of a large number of farmers.

Provider: 
Subject: 
cooperatives
agribusiness and cooperatives
Collected from: 

VEGMARC II: A COMPUTERIZED REORD KEEPING SYSTEM FOR VEGETABLE MARKETING COOPERATIVES

Provider: 
Subject: 
cooperatives
Collected from: 

The Horizon Problem Reconsidered

Provider: 
Subject: 
cooperatives
Collected from: