περάστε τις συμβουλές στο νοσοκομείο Αγορα Cialis χωρις συνταγη γιατρου στη συνέχεια διαβάστε προσεκτικά το σχολιασμό σε δισκία. Αγορα Βιαγκρα Ελλάδα Αθήνα το καλύτερο online κατάστημα στην Ελλάδα.
περάστε τις συμβουλές στο νοσοκομείο Αγορα Cialis χωρις συνταγη γιατρου στη συνέχεια διαβάστε προσεκτικά το σχολιασμό σε δισκία. Αγορα Βιαγκρα Ελλάδα Αθήνα το καλύτερο online κατάστημα στην Ελλάδα.
If profit-maximizing farmers are free to join or not to join a cooperative, it may appear reasonable to assume that a cooperative will exist only when it has cost advantaged over non-cooperative marketing. This paper presents a model in which that result fails. Every individual farmer chooses either to join or not join a cooperative depending on whether transactions costs are lower from cooperative membership or nonmembership. As cooperative membership increases, transactions costs for members decline, but for nonmembers these costs increase. Results of this analysis reveal that an equilibrium exists in which all farmers voluntarily choose to join the cooperative, but more than half of the members wish the cooperative had not been formed, and transactions costs in the aggregate are higher with the cooperative then without it.
Related Resources
New producer strategies: the emergence of patron-driven entrepreneurshipProvider: Subject: cooperatives agribusiness and cooperatives |
Farmers' Cooperatives in the EU: Policies, Strategies, and OrganizationProvider: Subject: policies agricultural policies cooperatives agribusiness and cooperatives |
Incentives to Efficient Investment Decisions in Agricultural CooperativesRecent studies have questioned the competitiveness of agricultural cooperatives in an industrialized food system, based on empirical results and economic theory. New organizational institutions have been proposed to overcome the cooperative main weaknesses (the so called new generation cooperatives). In this paper, we provide a simple model based on a financial approach to address the issue of cooperative competitiveness and to assess the investment efficiency of both traditional and new generation cooperatives. The main conclusions of the analysis are: i) cooperatives (both traditional and new generation ones) may have incentive to adopt projects that do not maximize the Net Present Value of the firm ii) the institutions of new generation cooperatives are not sufficient to ensure net present value maximization, even though they address some of the main concerns of traditional cooperatives iii) traditional cooperatives may have a competitive advantage in businesses that require the aggregation of a large number of farmers. Provider: Subject: cooperatives agribusiness and cooperatives Collected from: |
VEGMARC II: A COMPUTERIZED REORD KEEPING SYSTEM FOR VEGETABLE MARKETING COOPERATIVESProvider: Subject: cooperatives Collected from: Funded by: |
New producer strategies: the emergence of patron-driven entrepreneurshipProvider: Subject: cooperatives agribusiness and cooperatives |
Farmers' Cooperatives in the EU: Policies, Strategies, and OrganizationProvider: Subject: policies agricultural policies cooperatives agribusiness and cooperatives |
Incentives to Efficient Investment Decisions in Agricultural CooperativesRecent studies have questioned the competitiveness of agricultural cooperatives in an industrialized food system, based on empirical results and economic theory. New organizational institutions have been proposed to overcome the cooperative main weaknesses (the so called new generation cooperatives). In this paper, we provide a simple model based on a financial approach to address the issue of cooperative competitiveness and to assess the investment efficiency of both traditional and new generation cooperatives. The main conclusions of the analysis are: i) cooperatives (both traditional and new generation ones) may have incentive to adopt projects that do not maximize the Net Present Value of the firm ii) the institutions of new generation cooperatives are not sufficient to ensure net present value maximization, even though they address some of the main concerns of traditional cooperatives iii) traditional cooperatives may have a competitive advantage in businesses that require the aggregation of a large number of farmers. Provider: Subject: cooperatives agribusiness and cooperatives Collected from: |
VEGMARC II: A COMPUTERIZED REORD KEEPING SYSTEM FOR VEGETABLE MARKETING COOPERATIVESProvider: Subject: cooperatives Collected from: Funded by: |